According to Van Helsing at moonbattery.com:
The radical leftists currently in control of the federal government know that they have until the November elections to do as much damage to our country and our liberty as possible, and they aren't wasting a minute. The latest outrage — the Senate is handing Comrade Obama totalitarian power over the Internet. From CNET:
A new U.S. Senate bill would grant the president far-reaching emergency powers to seize control of or even shut down portions of the Internet.
The legislation announced [last] Thursday says that companies such as broadband providers, search engines, or software firms that the government selects "shall immediately comply with any emergency measure or action developed" by the Department of Homeland Security. …
That emergency authority would allow the federal government to "preserve those networks and assets and our country and protect our people," Joe Lieberman, the primary sponsor of the measure and the chairman of the Homeland Security committee, told reporters…
Note that the nefarious Joe Lieberman is also a sponsor of the latest attempt to deliberately plunge us into a depression with Cap & Tax. Some say Lieberman isn't so bad, because his fellow moonbats resent him for siding with Israel against its Muslim enemies. But this lone redeeming quality does not make him any less a menace to our country. No one who would participate in Al Gore's attempt to bully his way into the White House after losing the 2000 election belongs anywhere near a position of authority.
This latest leap forward toward totalitarianism is encountering resistance:
TechAmerica, probably the largest U.S. technology lobby group, said it was concerned about "unintended consequences that would result from the legislation's regulatory approach" and "the potential for absolute power." And the Center for Democracy and Technology publicly worried that the Lieberman bill's emergency powers "include authority to shut down or limit Internet traffic on private systems."
"Absolute power" is not hyperbole.
---------------------------------------
One blogger wrote:
Keep the internet and shut down the government.
----------------------------------------
What "Emergency" would this administration consider to shut down the internet? Obama's poll numbers too low? Bloggers getting the word out on all the corruption in Washington?
I guess we can say good-bye to the First Amendment of Free Speech and the Bill of Rights as we have always known it. If the FCC's desires to regulate the Internet, we will eventually lose our right to Privacy, Free Speech and it will be bye bye to our ability to interact with whomever we please.
A huge portion of my phone bill is in the form of "Fees, Charges and Taxes" already. The FCC is just looking for a way to "regulate" and then tax the internet. And, once again telling the fools it's for their own good and protection.
---------------------------------------
Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. ~ Ronald Reagan
Saturday, June 19, 2010
More Zero Tolerance Idiocy from "Educators". . . .
According to Gregory of Yardale at moonbattery.com:
In deep blue Rhode Island, an eight year old boy was sent home from school for wearing an Army hat with plastic soldiers on it. You see, the tiny plastic soldiers carried even tinier plastic "guns," which violated the school's "no weapons" policies.
Here's how the school's super-genius superintendent justified the action.
Superintendent Kenneth R. Di Pietro said the principal told the family that the hat would be fine if David replaced the Army men holding weapons with ones that didn't have any.
Di Pietro said the district does not allow images of weapons or drugs on clothing. For example, it would not allow a student to wear a shirt with a picture of a marijuana leaf on it.
Yeah, soldiers with guns = hippies with doobies. Liberal thought at its finest.
The kid should have just sliced off the weapons and posed the plastic soldiers erotically. He would have gotten a standing ovation.
Thursday, June 17, 2010
The Blame Game. . . .
Courtesy of BigFurHat at iowntheworld.com:
Alternative caption:
“So I said to him, ‘Barry, I know Abe Lincoln, and you’re no Abe Lincoln!’”
Alternative caption:
“So I said to him, ‘Barry, I know Abe Lincoln, and you’re no Abe Lincoln!’”
Filthy Hippies. . . .
Filthy Hippies
According to BigFurHat at iowntheworld.com:
This isn’t about any cause. This is about riding around like a moron with bells and whistles saying “loooooook at meeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!”
The tires they ride on – made with oil.
The plastic helmets – made with oil.
The foam bicycle seats – made with oil
Stupid Elton John sunglasses – made with oil
Plastic water bottles – made with oil
The apshalt streets – made with oil
The camera that is recording their idiocy? – made with oil
EVERYTHING is made with oil
yet….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlJKt8Etu64&feature=player_embedded
According to BigFurHat at iowntheworld.com:
This isn’t about any cause. This is about riding around like a moron with bells and whistles saying “loooooook at meeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!”
The tires they ride on – made with oil.
The plastic helmets – made with oil.
The foam bicycle seats – made with oil
Stupid Elton John sunglasses – made with oil
Plastic water bottles – made with oil
The apshalt streets – made with oil
The camera that is recording their idiocy? – made with oil
EVERYTHING is made with oil
yet….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlJKt8Etu64&feature=player_embedded
And They Say There Are No New Business Models. . . .WTF?
Courtesy of iowntheworld.com
She sells lemonade by the sea shore. She is purportedly making $250 a day ! ! ! !
Pelosi: We'll Stop Blaming Bush When the Problems Go Away. . . .
Pelosi: We'll Stop Blaming Bush When the Problems Go Away
According to Van Helsing at moonbattery.com:
Wondering when our Democrat rulers will stop blaming their failures on the previous administration? Probably never, according to Nasty Pelousy, who says she'll stop blaming W "when the problems go away"
---------------------------------------
One blogger wrote:
I think all that botox has finally gone to Nancy's brain and destroyed her two remaining brain cells.
---------------------------------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ok-GPwDn8NU&feature=player_embedded
According to Van Helsing at moonbattery.com:
Wondering when our Democrat rulers will stop blaming their failures on the previous administration? Probably never, according to Nasty Pelousy, who says she'll stop blaming W "when the problems go away"
---------------------------------------
One blogger wrote:
I think all that botox has finally gone to Nancy's brain and destroyed her two remaining brain cells.
---------------------------------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ok-GPwDn8NU&feature=player_embedded
Under Socialized Medicine, Belgian Nurses Admit to Killing Patients
Under Socialized Medicine, Belgian Nurses Admit to Killing Patients
According to Van Helsing at moonbattery.com:
Our government-dominated healthcare future is already on display in Belgium, where liberalism has triumphed to the extent that many Belgian nurses freely admit to killing the patients in their charge:
A high proportion of deaths classed as euthanasia in Belgium involved patients who did not ask for their lives to be ended, a study found.
More than 100 nurses admitted to researchers that they had taken part in 'terminations without request or consent'.
The legal term for this is murder.
Since its legalisation eight years ago, euthanasia now accounts for 2 per cent of deaths in Belgium — or around 2,000 a year.
The researchers found that a fifth of nurses admitted being involved in the assisted suicide of a patient.
But nearly half of these — 120 of 248 — also said there was no consent.
Of course, those are only the ones foolish enough to admit to homicide.
It is likely many nurses "under-reported" their involvement for fear of admitting an illegal activity, the study said.
Dr. Peter Saunders, director of Care Not Killing, is trying to keep euthanasia out of Britain's already highly hazardous version of socialized medicine. As he remarks,
"We should take a warning from this that wherever you draw the line, people will go up to it and beyond it."
Especially when the people involved are acting on behalf of increasingly unrestrained Big Government.
Down the slippery slope we slide. At the bottom is a world in which only those deemed valuable to The State are allowed to exist.
According to Van Helsing at moonbattery.com:
Our government-dominated healthcare future is already on display in Belgium, where liberalism has triumphed to the extent that many Belgian nurses freely admit to killing the patients in their charge:
A high proportion of deaths classed as euthanasia in Belgium involved patients who did not ask for their lives to be ended, a study found.
More than 100 nurses admitted to researchers that they had taken part in 'terminations without request or consent'.
The legal term for this is murder.
Since its legalisation eight years ago, euthanasia now accounts for 2 per cent of deaths in Belgium — or around 2,000 a year.
The researchers found that a fifth of nurses admitted being involved in the assisted suicide of a patient.
But nearly half of these — 120 of 248 — also said there was no consent.
Of course, those are only the ones foolish enough to admit to homicide.
It is likely many nurses "under-reported" their involvement for fear of admitting an illegal activity, the study said.
Dr. Peter Saunders, director of Care Not Killing, is trying to keep euthanasia out of Britain's already highly hazardous version of socialized medicine. As he remarks,
"We should take a warning from this that wherever you draw the line, people will go up to it and beyond it."
Especially when the people involved are acting on behalf of increasingly unrestrained Big Government.
Down the slippery slope we slide. At the bottom is a world in which only those deemed valuable to The State are allowed to exist.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
The Unexpected Addition to our Family. . . . .
Here's why your emails weren't filled with my blogs over the weekend. . . .I was a little preoccupied. . . .
Our sweet little Pepee surprised us by having a puppy. . . .We had no warning and little Kobe arrived about 1 am last Friday night. She is soooooo precious.
BTW. . . .I didn't know nothin bout birthin no puppies :) :)
Death Panels. . . .
Senate candidate Maurice Ferre advocates capping Medicare spending on end-of-life care for elderly
WEST PALM BEACH — Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Maurice Ferre says the U.S. spends an "absurd" amount on end-of-life care and should gradually move to a universal health system in which the government controls costs by setting prices for medical procedures and capping expenditures based on age and medical condition.
Speaking to The Palm Beach Post editorial board today, Ferre said he would have voted for the health care overhaul approved by Congress and signed by President Obama this year as "a step in the right direction." He later said the "Medicare-for-everyone" system he favors should be phased in over about 25 years.
Ferre, 75, is a former Miami mayor running a low-budget Democratic primary campaign against U.S. Rep. Kendrick Meek of Miami and Palm Beach billionaire Jeff Greene.
Answering a question about the long-term solvency of Social Security, Ferre said eventually raising the retirement age should be considered. He then went into a discussion of Medicare costs, saying a large amount of money typically is spent in the final three months of a person's life.
"I've already written in my will that I don't want you to go spending half a million dollars to keep me alive for three more months all tubed up with all kinds of liquids going in and out of my body and my mind slowly slipping away. It's a torture chamber," Ferre said.
"Now you say, well, that's a 'death panel.' Well, you know what, when you get to be 85 or 90 years old, you're going to die. And I'm sorry, you call it, Sarah Palin, what you want, but the fact is that it is absurd for us to be spending the types of money we're spending to extend life three months."
Asked what he'd do as a Senator to control such costs, Ferre said: "I would absolutely say that this is the cap on how much is available for you to spend at age 90, 87, with a heart condition of this sort, with diabetes of this sort, two legs missing and, you know, this is how much is available for you to spend. And you spend it any way you want."
He added: "My logic tells me that it is illogical to spend half a million dollars to extend a diabetic person who has two legs cut off, that we spend half a million dollars to tube up that person and extend their lives six months."
---------------------------------------
Well by golly Hitler felt the same way. . . .He didn't think there was a need for the elderly, mentally or physically disabled either.
---------------------------------------
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state/senate-candidate-maurice-ferre-advocates-capping-medicare-spending-737744.html
WEST PALM BEACH — Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Maurice Ferre says the U.S. spends an "absurd" amount on end-of-life care and should gradually move to a universal health system in which the government controls costs by setting prices for medical procedures and capping expenditures based on age and medical condition.
Speaking to The Palm Beach Post editorial board today, Ferre said he would have voted for the health care overhaul approved by Congress and signed by President Obama this year as "a step in the right direction." He later said the "Medicare-for-everyone" system he favors should be phased in over about 25 years.
Ferre, 75, is a former Miami mayor running a low-budget Democratic primary campaign against U.S. Rep. Kendrick Meek of Miami and Palm Beach billionaire Jeff Greene.
Answering a question about the long-term solvency of Social Security, Ferre said eventually raising the retirement age should be considered. He then went into a discussion of Medicare costs, saying a large amount of money typically is spent in the final three months of a person's life.
"I've already written in my will that I don't want you to go spending half a million dollars to keep me alive for three more months all tubed up with all kinds of liquids going in and out of my body and my mind slowly slipping away. It's a torture chamber," Ferre said.
"Now you say, well, that's a 'death panel.' Well, you know what, when you get to be 85 or 90 years old, you're going to die. And I'm sorry, you call it, Sarah Palin, what you want, but the fact is that it is absurd for us to be spending the types of money we're spending to extend life three months."
Asked what he'd do as a Senator to control such costs, Ferre said: "I would absolutely say that this is the cap on how much is available for you to spend at age 90, 87, with a heart condition of this sort, with diabetes of this sort, two legs missing and, you know, this is how much is available for you to spend. And you spend it any way you want."
He added: "My logic tells me that it is illogical to spend half a million dollars to extend a diabetic person who has two legs cut off, that we spend half a million dollars to tube up that person and extend their lives six months."
---------------------------------------
Well by golly Hitler felt the same way. . . .He didn't think there was a need for the elderly, mentally or physically disabled either.
---------------------------------------
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state/senate-candidate-maurice-ferre-advocates-capping-medicare-spending-737744.html
Obama Calls Oil Spill An 'Environmental 9/11. . . .WTF?
Why Didn't Chairman Zero and BP Accept Assistance from Royal Dutch Shell to Clean Up the Oil Spill?
According to Gregory of Yardale at moonbattery.com:
Soon after the explosion crippled the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, commencing the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the Royal Dutch Shell Corporation offered BP and the Obama Regime the use of some fifty supertankers — that were standing by, ready to go — to skim up the oil and limit the damage from the spill. BP and the Obama Regime refused.
Why would they refuse to use a proven method of oil spill containment in the opening days of the disaster? The main theory is an archaic, 1920s ERA protectionist law called the Jones Act — which exists primarily to shelter unionized workers from foreign competition — prevented Chairman Zero's regime from accepting aid from a foreign company in cleaning up the spill. That is, he would rather see the beaches of states that didn't vote for him befouled with oil than upset his union puppet-masters.
There's also the theory that Obama is just monumentally incompetent. But I have yet another theory why Chairman Zero would have refused help from the Dutch. Unfortunately, it is NSFW.
--------------------------
Obama Calls Oil Spill An 'Environmental 9/11. . . .
"In the same way that our view of our vulnerabilities and our foreign policy was shaped profoundly by 9/11, I think this disaster is going to shape how we think about the environment and energy for many years to come. One of the biggest leadership challenges for me going forward is going to be to make sure that we draw the right lessons from this disaster. Move forward in a bold way in a direction that finally gives us the kind of future-oriented... visionary energy policy that we so vitally need and has been absent for so long." ~ President Obama
Sounds like Obama believes just like Rahm Emanuel the current White House Chief of Staff that lived rent free in an apartment of a BP Advisor for five years. . . .
"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before." ~ Rahm Emanuel
--------------------------
WTF? Another Patriot type act for an oil spill? Oh hell yea. . . .This is code for the "American Powers Act" formerly known as Cap and Trade.
President Bush dismissed the "Jones Act" for a couple of weeks during Hurricane Katrina, so why wouldn't Obama? Let me tell you. . . .He would have hell to pay with the unions. . . .
There are thousands of miles of "boom" in warehouses right here in the US. This boom could be used to stop the spread of the oil, but it is just gathering dust while the oil spreads to Louisiana, Alabama and Florida. Why would the Obama administration not give Governor Jindal of Louisiana permission to build all the sand berms he requested to keep the oil from destroying the the marshes?
Obama doesn't want this crisis to go to waste and he will do everything in his power to pass the "American Power Act" which will be the biggest and costliest scam in the history of the world. Get ready to watch oil prices and your utilities skyrocket.
------------------------------------
http://politifi.com/news/Rahm-Emanuel-Lived-Rent-Free-in-Apartment-of-BP-Advisor-for-Five-Years-780562.html
According to Gregory of Yardale at moonbattery.com:
Soon after the explosion crippled the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, commencing the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the Royal Dutch Shell Corporation offered BP and the Obama Regime the use of some fifty supertankers — that were standing by, ready to go — to skim up the oil and limit the damage from the spill. BP and the Obama Regime refused.
Why would they refuse to use a proven method of oil spill containment in the opening days of the disaster? The main theory is an archaic, 1920s ERA protectionist law called the Jones Act — which exists primarily to shelter unionized workers from foreign competition — prevented Chairman Zero's regime from accepting aid from a foreign company in cleaning up the spill. That is, he would rather see the beaches of states that didn't vote for him befouled with oil than upset his union puppet-masters.
There's also the theory that Obama is just monumentally incompetent. But I have yet another theory why Chairman Zero would have refused help from the Dutch. Unfortunately, it is NSFW.
--------------------------
Obama Calls Oil Spill An 'Environmental 9/11. . . .
"In the same way that our view of our vulnerabilities and our foreign policy was shaped profoundly by 9/11, I think this disaster is going to shape how we think about the environment and energy for many years to come. One of the biggest leadership challenges for me going forward is going to be to make sure that we draw the right lessons from this disaster. Move forward in a bold way in a direction that finally gives us the kind of future-oriented... visionary energy policy that we so vitally need and has been absent for so long." ~ President Obama
Sounds like Obama believes just like Rahm Emanuel the current White House Chief of Staff that lived rent free in an apartment of a BP Advisor for five years. . . .
"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before." ~ Rahm Emanuel
--------------------------
WTF? Another Patriot type act for an oil spill? Oh hell yea. . . .This is code for the "American Powers Act" formerly known as Cap and Trade.
President Bush dismissed the "Jones Act" for a couple of weeks during Hurricane Katrina, so why wouldn't Obama? Let me tell you. . . .He would have hell to pay with the unions. . . .
There are thousands of miles of "boom" in warehouses right here in the US. This boom could be used to stop the spread of the oil, but it is just gathering dust while the oil spreads to Louisiana, Alabama and Florida. Why would the Obama administration not give Governor Jindal of Louisiana permission to build all the sand berms he requested to keep the oil from destroying the the marshes?
Obama doesn't want this crisis to go to waste and he will do everything in his power to pass the "American Power Act" which will be the biggest and costliest scam in the history of the world. Get ready to watch oil prices and your utilities skyrocket.
------------------------------------
http://politifi.com/news/Rahm-Emanuel-Lived-Rent-Free-in-Apartment-of-BP-Advisor-for-Five-Years-780562.html
Ax May Fall on Mortgage Interest Deduction. . . .WTF?
Ax May Fall on Mortgage Interest Deduction
According to Paul L. Caron at taxprof.typepad.com:
The Hill, Ax May Fall on Tax Break for Mortgages:
The popular tax break for mortgage interest, once considered untouchable, is falling under the scrutiny of policymakers and economic experts seeking ways to close huge deficits.
Although Congress last year rejected the White House’s proposed cut to the amount wealthier taxpayers can deduct for home mortgage interest payments, the administration included it again in its 2010 budget — saying it could save $208 billion over the next decade.
And now that sentiment has turned against all the federal red ink — and cost-cutting is in vogue — Democrats on President Barack Obama’s financial commission are considering the wisdom of permanent tax breaks such as the mortgage deduction and corporate deferral. Calling them “tax entitlements,” senior Democratic lawmakers have argued they should be on the table for reform just like traditional entitlement programs Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid. ...
Although the backers of the mortgage interest tax break defend it as a key incentive for people to own rather than rent their homes, some say that’s not so. A Brookings-Urban Tax Policy Center study found that the mortgage interest tax break costs more than $100 billion annually but does little to encourage the middle class and less wealthy to buy homes. “I’m not sure that we need to subsidize homeownership at all through the tax system,” said Eric Toder, the study’s lead author.
----------------------------------
One blogger wrote:
But it doesn't save anything. It takes more from people. To say it will save the government money is to assume the money was the government's in the first place.
----------------------------------
WTF?
Bet you probably haven't heard this yet. . . .The democrat majority in congress now wants to remove the interest deduction on our mortgages.
I would think that if they wanted to stimulate the economy they would bring back the interest deductions on purchasing a new car and on credit cards, but oh no these bast*rds want to screw us over even more with our mortgages by removing this deduction. I don't know about you, but last year we paid in over $8,000 in interest on our home. Can you imagine what you will owe at the end of the year if this interest deduction is removed.
If your home is almost paid for this is no big deal to you, but you need to think of your children that may be close to purchasing their first home. If this congress would just cut spending and we got to keep more of our money each year this might be feasible. . . .but you know this money hungry congress will NEVER cut spending and entitlements.
This will mean that you will be paying much more to the government every year than you do now and no matter how you dice it or slice it. . . .it will be a tax increase.
I thought Obama promised that "I won't raise your taxes one dime"
----------------------------------
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2010/06/ax-may-fall-.html
According to Paul L. Caron at taxprof.typepad.com:
The Hill, Ax May Fall on Tax Break for Mortgages:
The popular tax break for mortgage interest, once considered untouchable, is falling under the scrutiny of policymakers and economic experts seeking ways to close huge deficits.
Although Congress last year rejected the White House’s proposed cut to the amount wealthier taxpayers can deduct for home mortgage interest payments, the administration included it again in its 2010 budget — saying it could save $208 billion over the next decade.
And now that sentiment has turned against all the federal red ink — and cost-cutting is in vogue — Democrats on President Barack Obama’s financial commission are considering the wisdom of permanent tax breaks such as the mortgage deduction and corporate deferral. Calling them “tax entitlements,” senior Democratic lawmakers have argued they should be on the table for reform just like traditional entitlement programs Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid. ...
Although the backers of the mortgage interest tax break defend it as a key incentive for people to own rather than rent their homes, some say that’s not so. A Brookings-Urban Tax Policy Center study found that the mortgage interest tax break costs more than $100 billion annually but does little to encourage the middle class and less wealthy to buy homes. “I’m not sure that we need to subsidize homeownership at all through the tax system,” said Eric Toder, the study’s lead author.
----------------------------------
One blogger wrote:
But it doesn't save anything. It takes more from people. To say it will save the government money is to assume the money was the government's in the first place.
----------------------------------
WTF?
Bet you probably haven't heard this yet. . . .The democrat majority in congress now wants to remove the interest deduction on our mortgages.
I would think that if they wanted to stimulate the economy they would bring back the interest deductions on purchasing a new car and on credit cards, but oh no these bast*rds want to screw us over even more with our mortgages by removing this deduction. I don't know about you, but last year we paid in over $8,000 in interest on our home. Can you imagine what you will owe at the end of the year if this interest deduction is removed.
If your home is almost paid for this is no big deal to you, but you need to think of your children that may be close to purchasing their first home. If this congress would just cut spending and we got to keep more of our money each year this might be feasible. . . .but you know this money hungry congress will NEVER cut spending and entitlements.
This will mean that you will be paying much more to the government every year than you do now and no matter how you dice it or slice it. . . .it will be a tax increase.
I thought Obama promised that "I won't raise your taxes one dime"
----------------------------------
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2010/06/ax-may-fall-.html
Will Our Money Go To Hamas?
Will Our Money Go To Hamas?
According to Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) at biggovernment.com:
We are $13 trillion in debt. We will be $19.6 trillion in debt come 2015. Yet, the President wants to send $400 million for “humanitarian aid” to the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, an area controlled by the terrorist organization Hamas. As well intentioned this offer may be how can we be sure our money will not be used to fund terrorist activities? Well, we can’t.
If the money given to the late PLO chief Yasser Arafat is any indication, our dollars will be used to fund more terrorist activities and line the pockets of those in charge. Moreover, people have been sentenced to prison for funneling money to Hamas under the guise of “humanitarian aid,” so it’s a bit peculiar that our government would send money under the same conditions.
Before one dime is handed over to the Palestinians, Congress needs to do its due diligence to ensure there are safeguards in place to prevent money from being used for terrorist activities.
---------------------------------
One blogger wrote:
Ughhhhh.....what money? You mean we have some left?
---------------------------------
So you can go to prison for funneling money to Hamas, but it is okay for Obama to send this same terrorist organization $400 million of our taxpayer dollars in "humanitarian aid” As disgusting as it is for our tax dollar going to support terrorist. Why would this be any more hypocritical than the other things that our government does?
Bernie Madoff is spending 150 years in prison for a billion dollar ponzi/pyramid scheme. What is Social Security? A trillion dollar ponzi/pyramid scheme. Social Security depends on there always being someone "new" to pay into the system to continue paying the current recipients. This is exactly why cities all across America are going broke.
Just take a look at the Dallas Police Department. The DPD has thousands of retirees drawing a hefty pension. The Dallas Police Department is now laying off, so there is no "new" blood paying into their retirement fund. So you multiply this with almost every Police and Fire Department across the country and you will see why the cities are short millions of dollars.
Now Obama wants to spend $50 billion emergency taxpayer dollars to bailout cities. When will this madness end?
---------------------------------
http://biggovernment.com/mbachmann/2010/06/11/will-our-money-go-to-hamas/
Friday, June 11, 2010
OBAMA SINGS KICK ASS SONG. . . . .
OBAMA SINGS KICK ASS SONG. . . . .
To watch the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yghFBt-fXmw
Scenes From Cuba Michael Moore Doesn't Want You To See. . . .
By: RUSS SPENCER/myfoxatlanta
ATLANTA - Governor Perdue was back in Georgia Wednesday after a two-day trip to Cuba. The aim of the trip was to lay the groundwork to expand Georgia exports to the communist nation, where the government makes all the buying decisions.
Georgia farmers and agribusiness leaders got a chance to see one of the markets where their products might end up and they were stunned by what they saw.
Phil Green, the CEO of Visions Telecom, went on the trip and he said his communist counterpart led him to believe the Cuban government isn't interested in widespread access to the internet, and like China, wants to control access to information.
-----------------------------------------
Michael Moore and his liberal buddies can sugarcoat and tie a big bow around communism and their support for the Castro brothers, but the people of Cuba are suffering.
-----------------------------------------
Watch the video:
http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/dpp/news/mission-to-cuba%3A-reflections-of-the-trip-060910
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
